CHIRP Flight Crew Feedback 158

Oct 6, 2026

Recurring themes in this edition of CHIRP ATFB 158, October 2026, are fatigue, and the way rostering apps and loosely worded Ops Manuals push a burden onto individual crew. A second thread is trust: people lose confidence in internal reporting when their reports are simply read and closed without meaningful feedback.

FC5466 – Line Check Conduct: A training captain’s aggressive interventions during a captain’s approach brief undermined his performance.

FC5426 – FTLs and duty periods routinely exceeded: 24-hour shifts are the norm, sometimes extended to 30 hours or more through discretion, within a bullying culture.

FC5423 – “CAA has approved it”: A pilot questioned 120-minute ETOPS operations on a freighter without approval.

FC5429 – App not up to standard: The rostering app allows poor crew pairings, makes unexplained changes, gives no clear FTL visibility and crashes.

FC5430 – Pressure to work on days off: Pilots get incentivised texts asking them to work during leave, which erodes their recovery time.

FC5431 – Pressure to check  app during crew rest: Crew must check the app 120 minutes before report time, which effectively puts them on standby.

FC5432 – Commander’s discretion: A first officer’s rest was reduced without the commander being consulted, and his report was simply closed.

FC5433 – Car park disruption: Changes to the drop-off area turned a 5-minute crew bus transfer into up to 45 minutes, eating into rest.

FC5442 – Challenging CRM situation: Splitting flight and cabin crew across hotels, with cabin crew waiting over three hours for rooms, fuelled resentment and fatigue.

FC5448 – Landing gear locking pins: Ramp agents fitted gear pins and started the APU without engineering sign-off.

FC5463 – Concerned passenger: only one pilot in the cockpit: A passenger saw a pilot socialising in the galley for about 45 minutes.

Photo source: CHIRP

CHIRP ATFB 158
←
back to news
Made by Riffmax & Powered by Webflow